Fujifilm X-T4 | Shadow & Highlight recovery Test | liewwk Nature

In with conjunction previous other Fujifilm X system testing

Birding Photography with Fujifilm X-T4 | liewwk Nature

Birding Photography with Fujifilm X-T4 | liewwk Nature

One of the basic requirements of the camera, how much do we able to from Shadow & Highlight (under & overexpose).

Here are some basic tests

– Fujifilm X-T4, FUJINON XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR

– Handheld

– Same ISO, F-number, Shutter Speed, Auto WB

– Adobe Camera RAW 12.4, same recovery and other parameters for the same test

*** I found the Dynamic Range setting not just affect JPEG output, but also affects the data inside the RAW files. So testing also included DR100 (off), DR200 (suppose reserve highlight exposure 1 stop) & DR400 (suppose reserve highlight exposure 2 stop)

But check out the RAW files recovery result below !!! it is some magic that happens !!!  

################################################

1. Highlight Recovery Test

1A. Highlight Recovery Test: Dynamic Range setting

– make sure of in Camera setting to protect Highlight details

– Dynamic Range 100 (off), 200 (protect 1 stop highlight information) & 400 (protect 2 stops highlight information)

CAMERA JPEG output

Even with the direct JPEG output, the highlight details have been protected (DR200 1 stop and DR400 2 stops). But let’s have a look at the RAW file recovery

LEFT: DR100

CENTER: DR200

RIGHT: DR400

 

 

#

1B. Highlight Recovery Test: RAW files recovery

Test1: Highlight recovery from RAW files

– ISO1000, F5.6, 1/15 – this makes the picture +4 (4 stops overexpose)

– Adobe Camera Raw recovery. [Highlight -100%, Exposure -3.00]

 

#

Test1Bi. Highlight recovery, DR100 (DR off)

– All setting same as mentioned above

DR100

LEFT: Direct JPEG from Camera

CENTER: RAW

RIGHT: recovery setting as above and save as JPEG

 

 

#

Test1Bii. Highlight recovery, DR200

– All setting same as mentioned above

DR200

LEFT: Direct JPEG from Camera

CENTER: RAW

RIGHT: recovery setting as above and save as JPEG

#

Test1Bii. Highlight recovery, DR400

– All setting same as mentioned above

DR400

LEFT: Direct JPEG from Camera

CENTER: RAW

RIGHT: recovery setting as above and save as JPEG

#

Here’s come the magic of the RAW file and the Dynamic Range settings !!!!

– Look at the right face of the toy & background paper beg

– the DR400 not just protect highlight data in JPEG but in the RAW file, preserve more than what we expect (3 stops + 100% hight recovery)

DR400
DR200
DR100

 

 

 

#

2. Shadow Recovery Test

– 5 stops underexpose

– ISO800, F5.6, 1/8000

– DR100, 200, 400

– below are JPEG direct output from Camera

 

#

Test2A. Shadow recovery

Test1: Highlight recovery from RAW files

– ISO800, F5.6, 1/8000

– this makes the picture -5 (5 stops underexpose)

– Adobe Camera Raw recovery. [Exposure +5.00]

#

As the discussion of Dynamic Range is to protect Highlight data of the pictures. But I still go ahead with my test with DR100, 200 & 400

#

Test2Ai. Shadow recovery, DR100

Test2Ai. Shadow recovery, DR200

Test2Ai. Shadow recovery, DR400

#

For the 5 stops Shadow recovery, most of the details of the focused object still intact.

But when we turn on the Dynamic Range (DR200 & 400) gives an impact on the RAW files.  Something really weird where DR400 actually give negative impact which produces more color noise and purple tint when exposure recovery

#

So we need 2 settings for Highlight & Shadow recovery

1. Highlight recovery: Highly recommend Turn on DR400

2. Shadow recovery: Highly recommended Turn of DR which is DR100

#

################################################

More Pictures with #Fujifilm #XT4

More Videos with #Fujifilm #XT4

######################################################

liewwk Nature Pictures collection

liewwk Nature Youtube collection

######################################################

Birds Watch/Photograph tour feel free to

contact me

观鸟或拍鸟团  您可

联络我

or

HERE

 

######################################################

 

CANON EOS 1dx Mark1 vs 1dx Mark2

Did 2 round of simple test outdoor but the lighting condition seem not a good equal compare .. so finally managed to have both indoor to test both 1dx Mark1 and 1dx Mark2

very simple test

1. AV mode, F8 , meter at same area

2. ISO100 with exp 0, -1,-2,-3,-4,+1,+2

3. ISO200, 400,800,1600,3200,4000,6400,12800,25600

4. all with select portion to 100% crop

5. all picture open with Adobe Camera Raw (CC) and NO Noise reduction, sharpen

6. liveview with timer 2s shooting, on tripod

 

IMG_5657 fb IMG_5658 fb

 

Physically , not much change but it do have the Liveview Video-Still switch which one of the MAJOR missing of mark1 !!!!!!!!!!!

Below are the pictures sample

ISO100 1dxm1

ISO100 1dxm2

 

click link below for all ISO100 full size

1dx1 ISO100 exp -1

1dx2 ISO100 exp -1

 

100% crop for ISO100 exp -1 for 1dxm1

100% crop for ISO100 exp -1 for 1dxm2

 

1dx1 ISO100 exp -2

1dx2 ISO100 exp -2

 

1dx1 ISO100 exp -3

1dx2 ISO100 exp -3

 

1dx1 ISO100 exp -4

1dx2 ISO100 exp -4

 

100% crop for ISO100 exp -4 for 1dxm1

100% crop for ISO100 exp -4 for 1dxm2

 

###############################################

both ISO100 Exp0 100%

1dxm1

1dxm2

 

###############################################

here is the links for

1dxm1 ISO200

1dxm2 ISO200

 

1dxm1 ISO400

1dxm2 ISO400

 

1dxm1 ISO800

1dxm2 ISO800

 

1dxm1 ISO1600

1dxm2 ISO1600

100% crop for 1dxm1 ISO1600

100% crop for 1dxm2 ISO1600

1dxm1 ISO3200

1dxm2 ISO3200

100% crop for 1dxm1 ISO3200

100% crop for 1dxm2 ISO3200

 

1dxm1 ISO6400

1dxm2 ISO6400

100% crop for 1dxm1 ISO6400

100% crop for 1dxm2 ISO6400

1dxm1 ISO12800

1dxm2 ISO12800

100% crop for 1dxm1 ISO12800

100% crop for 1dxm2 ISO12800

 

 

1dxm1 ISO25600

1dxm2 ISO25600

*** not really accept noise level >6400 so just share the full size picture of 25600 … no 100% crop pictures

 

###############################################

for the simple test , my personal feel on the 1dxm1 vs 1dxm2

1. mirror shake seem less on mark2 especially the slow fps which is 6fps . mark2 seem seem almost no mirror shake at all

2. AF for liveview seem much faster for mark2 , non liveview seem faster too but not significant as the liveview AF

3. ISO from 100-3200 seem almost same at exposure 0 , mark2 may be slightly better than mark1

4. all pictures shoot within same environment , same ISO, same shutter speed, same aperture … but mark2 seem slight brighter especially on shadow area .

5. ISO4000-25600 …. hmmmm mark1 seem better at shadow area ?

6. for shadow area recovery for -1 stop seem not far different . but for 2,3,4 stops under… mark2 have better software capability to recover better …. much better ….

 

########################################################################################

related posts

Birds Watch/Photograph tour feel free to contact me

观鸟或拍鸟团  您可联络我

or REFER

HERE

 

##################################

 

more Photohunter Outing/Events/Workshop click HERE

look for more advices or order for Filters/Tripod for Landscape or etc   click HERE

 

or contact me HERE

##################################################################################

 

###############################################################################

related posts

i. CANON EOS 5Dsr vs SONY A7r2

ii. CANON EOS 5DSR vs 5Dm3