new Wildlife Photography era ? Do I worry on ISO ?

few years ago, when I start introduce Topaz Denoise… I am amaze with the result… still remember I introduce to most of my friends and I think it clean up and maintain most the “usable” ISO image   which mean it still subject to image with very acceptable ISO (maintain details and not that bad grain) Those day, I am accept up to ~ISO8000

But recently, Adobe introduce new Enhance – Denoise. I am now change my workflow again !!! yes .. I am dare to shoot anything ~ISO12800-16000. (I will update some image soon) lets have a look at original image (click the link)

ISO10000

CANON R3, ISO10000 no Denoise
CANON R3, ISO10000, Topaz Denoise Raw – medium
CANON R3, ISO10000, Photoshop Enhance-Denoise 50%

 

#####

ISO8000

CANON R3, ISO8000 no Denoise
CANON R3, ISO8000, Topaz Denoise Raw – medium
CANON R3, ISO8000, Photoshop Enhance-Denoise 50%

 

 

DxO PureRaw 2 Noise reduction performance … CANON R5 & SONY A1

few months ago my friend introduce to me “DxO PureRaw 2” for very good noise reduction. I am bit busy last few months and finally I have time download to check out ISO performance of Fujifilm XH2-S , CANON R7 which both APS-C sensor which most the users concern on ISO performance. But we know when smaller sensor normally has more noise with bigger sensor camera (with same megapixel). Too bad both camera raw files are not supported by the DxO PureRaw 2. But I decide to make a simple test with CANON R5 & A1

几个月前,朋友介绍了这款新的软件。大概是降噪非常好,比我之前介绍的Topaz Denoise 好。

我一直较忙,这几天终于有时间坐下清理照片。处理一些事情。还有最近试了2架新的半幅的相机(富士 XH2-S & 佳能 R7) ,大家(包括我)都有点担心点问题。因为我们这的摄影环境都较暗。我们也希望有较长的焦距,半幅的相机都是我们想用可是主要担心点问题。

可是,这个软件 DxO PureRaw 2 尽然还不支持这两架相机,可是尽然已下载。我也试试在高像素相机之一的佳能R5 &索尼 A1 (迟一点会放上)

Simple test with CANON R5 & SONY A1

I only test 2 ISO – ISO2000 because this is my comfortable accept ISO for R5 and ISO6400 is my highest auto ISO set for R5 & ISO4000 for A1 .

– Click the picture to see original full size picture.

– the DxO PureRaw really process the raw file into a DNG file with very good noise-details balance output.

– please support original software

i. CANON R5 : ISO2000

CANON R5
ISO2000
no Noise Reduction
CANON R5
ISO2000
DxO PureRaw 2 only
CANON R5
ISO2000
Topaz Denoise AI Auto

ii. CANON R5 : ISO6400

CANON R5
ISO6400
CANON R5
ISO6400
Topaz Denoise
CANON R5
ISO6400
DxO PureRaw 2

 

iii. SONY A1 : ISO2000

SONY A1
ISO2000

 

SONY A1
ISO2000
Topaz Denoise – AI Auto
SONY A1
ISO2000
DxO PureRaw 2

 

iv. SONY A1 : ISO4000

SONY A1
ISO6400
SONY A1
ISO4000
Topaz Denoise AI Auto
SONY A1
ISO4000
DxO PureRaw 2

 

####

my recent posts

3 days with CANON R7 + RF600mm F4 – IS, Battery life, AF, ISO samples

Field experience with Fujifilm X-H2S + Fujinon XF150-600mm f/5.6-8

 

Should I use Camera Long Exposures Noise Reduction ?

Me and my gang have a short discussion last week whether should  we use the camera Long exposures noise reduction (NR) or not … as it normally produce hot pixel (red dots) after the long exposures shot especially involve a lot of dark area (black, dark grey ….). e.g. show below

Red dots appear … without the Long Exposure (LE) NR turn on camera body

But from my experience the noises and even the red dot can be reduce manually in Adobe Camera Raw (ACR) noise reduction function …

here are few pictures capture

1. with LE NR turn on

2. no LE NR turn and no PP

2. no LE NR turn and with ACR NR

simple ACR Noise Reduction

a 100% crop of 3 pictures above

*** all the setting are the same and it look slight different due to the sky turning dark …

Canon 5dm2 + Canon 1635L

# Exposure Time (1 / Shutter Speed) = 79/1 second ===> 79 second
# Lens F-Number / F-Stop = 11/1 ===> ƒ/11
# ISO Speed Ratings = 200

based on the 3 pictures compare

– picture with LE NR turn on body require double exposure time
– less noise especially the “red dot”/hot pixel
– the one without any NR with more details
– simple NR on non LE NR picture can reduce more noise and all red-dot (hot pixel) disappear. Even less details compare to the LE NR turn on picture. But this sure can be fine tune by some masking the foreground or main object

So if you ask me, is it worth to spend double the time while shooting ? my answer is no while I can reduce the noise in PP … so I will safe more time to shoot and remove the noise later …..